![]() ![]() I’m not in the business of making scenario-based decisions for people. But if your worst case is a full-scale whammy–such as a terrorism campaign that levels cities and/or causes a long-term grid-down societal collapse, then you will probably want to move to a remote, lightly populated farming region with plentiful water. You can just “stock up”, improve your home’s security features, and stay put where you are. ![]() It all depends on your personal “worst case scenario.” But if your envisioned worst case is an economic depression similar to that of the 1930s–with a relatively intact infrastructure–then you might conclude that there is no need to relocate. From an actuarial standpoint, you might have nearly as good a chance of living to a ripe old age if you stay in the suburbs. And some have good health, while others need to live close to medical specialists.Įven more importantly, before deciding where you might move, you have to weigh the Risks and Benefits of moving at all. Some need the stimulation of exposure to the arts, while others could care less. ![]() Some folks like the feeling of privacy provided by a wall of trees where others would feel claustrophobic. Some people prefer dry climates while others can’t stand them. Everyone has their personal needs and expectations. Much ike buying a pair of boots, the decision has as much to do with the size and shape of your feet as it does the maker of the boots. Granted, there are a lot of places that are much better than others, but there is no single “one size fits all” perfect place. When doing radio interviews or giving lectures, I’m often asked where the “perfect” place is for a survival retreat. #Surviving mars wiki drone assembly plant updateJWR’s Introductory Note: The following is a slightly expanded update to a post that I wrote for SurvivalBlog back in September of 2005: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |